.
OK here is your chance at redemption. I am not even going to tell you what the game is you will have to click to find out. It takes less than a minute and you really don't have to think as hard as yesterday.
For the record my number was 23 what was yours?
16 comments:
I just did that one for another forum. :) My number was 14. :P
My number was 25, mostly because I have no moral compass at all.
so I was a 12, looks like I must be a wuss. :-(
....Back to work.
Wow!I could take out 25 of the little suckers. I may not be smarter than a fifth grader but I'm a bad ass in kindergarten!!
20. you must have some height on me. i like the idea of taking on 5 year olds more than 5th graders.
You see what it is, is I have twin 5 year olds at home that I get to practice on. So that gives me a little advantage.
I'm ashamed to admit it, but 14. Does that mean J-Wim could kick my ass? (Yeah, probably.)
My number was 25. But reality is none.
Uncle Jack
17 for me. Why does this make me feel good?
Great thing about 5 yo's are they are easy to swing in circles, you just have to grab their ankles. Do they still have a soft spot on their skulls?
I got a number of 23, but I think I could take out more than that.
If you hear any news reports about such a thing happening in AZ, please delete this comment.
I only got 14. But who would really beat up a 5 year old? Well, probably Vanilla-- he has war games in his house! :-) Maybe I could've when I was a teenager and had an annoying kid sister.
Only 15 - UGGHHH! I am such a wimp
31, I am ashamed
looks like 12 of the little buggers is the max I can take on. I have to stay away from 5th graders!
22 -- Maybe I could use the 5 year old to take on the 5th graders?
18 for me, interesting concept :-)
Post a Comment